Studies correct or not?

 

Sources: Database III Harold van der Heijden, 2005.

 

This is not a page to show how many mistakes are made by composers.

This is just a page to get chessplayers to analyse studies.

Making a correct or almost correct study is still much more difficult than to find a mistake or a flaw in a creation.

It also takes a lot of time to make a good original study. Sometimes weeks or even years!!!

And also an incorrect study can still have some beautiful variations, ideas and positions!

You also are invited to find a way to correct these studies.

 

    C.J. De Feijter 1958.

How does white stop the c-pawn!

White plays and makes a draw!

 

-   Call for: TOP-40 of Endgamestudies!

    Send me your list of your 20 most beautiful endgamestudies and I will make a TOP-40 (or longer).

    This list will be demonstrated on this website.

    Send an e-mail with your list to: 

 

1. Incorrect (cooked) studies?.

 

2. Duals found?.

 

3. Correct but ...!

 

4. In this .pgn file two studies send by Odd Řivind Bergstad not yet in the HHDb3.

 

Please sign the guestbook and let us know what you search for or what should be improved.

 

Peter Boll.

 

Homepage ARVES.