ARVES Chess Endgamestudy Association.
Search
≡
Open menu
Home
News
Latest News
Tournament Calendar
Archived news messages
Awards
tournament results
Awards Files
Awards replayable
registered users see more
Endgame Studies
Miniatures
Malyutkas
Pawns only
Pawns against others
Knights and Pawns
Knight against Bishop
Knight against Rook
Knight against Queen
Two Knights
Bishops and Pawns
Bishop against Knight
Bishop against Rook
Bishop + Knight others
Bishop against Queen
Two Bishops
Rooks and Pawns
Rook against Knight
Rook against Bishop
Rooks against Queen
Rook + Knight others
Rook + Bishop others
Two Rooks
Queens and Pawns
Queen against Rooks
Queen against others
Training
Study of the year
Study of the year 2015
Study of the year 2014
Study of the year 2013
Study of the year 2012
Study of the year 2010
Studies of the years 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011
Studies by theme
sample cql-files
Albino pawn
Allumwandlung - all promotions
Bristol theme
Castling
Caterpillar - Triple pawns
Chameleon Echo stalemates
Cross check
Doublechecks
Double Excelsior
Duras theme
Excelsior theme
Festina Lente
Fortress
Grimshaw
Ideal Mirror mate
Indian theme
Knight chases other Knight
Knight visits at least twenty different squares.
Kozirev alikes
Loman's move
Miniatures
Mirror mate
Mutual zugzwangs 5-Pieces
Nowotny
Obtrusive bishop
Passed pawn search
Pinned mate
Plachutta
Prokes Manoeuvre
Queen staircase
Rambling Rook
Rook traverses a rectangle
Rook visits each corner
Samecolor Bishops
Troitzky's ending
Unguarded Guard
Valladeo theme
Zwickmuhle / Torre-Lasker theme
Studies by Composer
registered users see more
Instructive studies
Endgamestudy Presentations on Video
Theory
Glossary
Terminology
What is an Endgamestudy?
A minor dual is not a big deal
How to Compose?
Endgame Tablebases
check a 7-men position
GBR code
Hall of Fame
Composers by Alphabet
Composers by Country
Composers by Production Total
Composers by Timeline
Composers born to 1900
Composers born 1900-1932
Composers born >=1933
First Prizes
First prizes 2020
First prizes 2019
First Prizes 2018
First Prizes 2017
First Prizes 2016
First Prizes 2015
First Prizes 2014
First Prizes 2013
First Prizes 2012
First Prizes 2011
First Prizes 2010
Alexander Rueb
Collections
magazines
Magazine EG
EG issues 191 - 214
PDFs to download
EG issues 1 - 190
PDFs to download
EG index
Magyar Sakkvilag 2020
Finals and themes
Argentina magazine
Finales Y Temas
articles PDF
Finales y Temas 131
Finales y Temas 130
Finales Y Temas 129
Finales Y Temas 128
Finales Y Temas 127
Finales Y Temas 126
Finales Y Temas 125
Finales Y Temas 124
Finales Y Temas 123
Finales Y Temas 122
Problem Forum
German magazine
Problem Forum
all
Problem Forum 75
Problem Forum 74
Problem Forum 73
Problem Forum 72
Problem Forum 71
Problem Forum 70
Problem Forum 69
Problem Forum 68
Problem Forum 67
Problem Forum 66
Problem Forum 65
Problem Forum 64
Harold van der Heijden Database
Harold van der Heijden Database Sources
Weltenfern
book by Siegfried Hornecker
Chess Query Language 6
Endgame Study Database
over 25000 studies to find
Authors and Books
Websites
links to others
Downloads
registered users only
British Endgame Study News
British Endgame Study News 1996 (March)
British Endgame Study News 1996 (June)
BESN article about: K+R+B vs K+R
Studies Richard Réti by John Beasley
Depth and Beauty, Artur Mandler book by John Beasley
Reciprocal zugzwangs up to six men
About
Welcome
What We Try To Achieve
What We Do
EG
Agenda
Solving Contests
Arves Solving contests statistics
Arves 10th solving Ty 2019
Arves 9th Solving Ty 2018
Arves 8th Solving Ty 2017
Arves 7th Solving Ty 2016
Tata Solvingcontest 2015
Tata Solvingcontest 2013
Tata Solvingcontest 2012
Tata 2nd Solvingcontest 2011
Who We Are
Board
Become a Member
Photo Gallery
Login or Register
Archive
Paul Valois
Endgames Instructions on YouTube
Chess Query Language 3.02
Introduction
How to Install CQL?
How to run CQL?
CQL Syntactic conventions
CQL Matching games
CQL Matching positions
CQL Finding pairs of positions: The relation list
CQL Tagging: keeping track of piece identity
Downloading CQL
Frequently Asked Questions
CQL Documentation
Magazine EBUR
EBUR-index
Arves Books
Composers by Production HHdbV
Corrections by Peter Krug
Dutch
Alexander Rueb
Oploswedstrijd 2019
Oploswedstrijd 2016
Oploswedstrijd 2011
Oploswedstrijd 2010
Oploswedstrijd 2009
Oploswedstrijd 2008
Oploswedstrijd 2007
Oploswedstrijd 2006
Oploswedstrijd 2004
Oploswedstrijd 2003
Oploswedstrijd 2002
Oploswedstrijd 2001
Historie ARVES
Problemist Ukraine 2024
Avni-70 JT 2024
Sergey Osintsev-JT 64
Finales Y Temas 138
Finales Y Temas 137
Babson Task by Gady Costeff
Liptovsky Mikulas 2024
Hornecker MT 2024
UAPA 23rd 2024
FRME 6th TT 2024
Finales Y Temas 136
SŠZ 100 JT 2024
The Problemist 2023
Sachova Skladba 2023
Jirtdan 2024
Chess Artistry Adventure 2024
Die Schwalbe 2021-2022
8th YCCC 2024
Congress Polish Chess Composers 2024
Finales Y Temas 135
Chess Artistry Adventure in memory of Pal Benko 2022
Finales Y Temas 134
Vratnica-64 2023
Problem Paradise 2023
Pat a Mat 2022-2023
Tehtavaniekka 2023
Variantim 2023
UAPA 22th 2023
Finales Y Temas 133
Sachova Skladba 2022
Schach 2022-2023
Bilokin 85 MT
The Macedonian Problemist 2023
Nosek 70 JT
Oploswedstrijd 2024
Studies awarded for the Sachova Skladba 2021
[Event "1st Prize Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Steffen Nielsen"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3B4/K1p2Rbr/8/kP6/1p6/1P1p4/8/8 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "21"] [EventDate "2022"] 1. Rf5 $1 (1. Bxc7+ $2 Kxb5 2. Kb7 Kc5 3. Rd7 $11) (1. b6 $2 cxb6 2. Rf5+ $4 Be5+ $19) 1... Bd4+ (1... Bc3 2. b6+ c5+ 3. b7+ $18) 2. b6+ c5+ 3. b7+ Kb5 { Position A with wRf5} 4. Rh5 $3 ({Try:} 4. Ka8 $2 Rxb7 5. Kxb7 d2 6. Rf1 Be5 $1 7. Rd1 Bc3 8. Rh1 Be5 9. Rd1 (9. Rh6 c4 $11) 9... Bc3 {positional draw.}) 4... Rd7 $1 (4... Rf7 5. Ka8 Rxb7 6. Kxb7 d2 7. Rh6 c4 8. Rh5+ $18) 5. Rd5 $1 Rh7 { Position A with wRd5} 6. Ka8 (6. Rd6 $2 c4+ 7. Rxd4 cxb3 8. Rxd3 Kc6 $11) 6... Rxb7 7. Kxb7 d2 8. Rd6 d1=Q 9. Rb6+ Ka5 10. Ra6+ Kb5 11. Ra5# {Mate to the black king results from White/^s actions that are well thought-out from the beginning to the end of the play. Yes, nowadays it is hard to surprise anyone with reciprocal checks and counterchecks, albeit they are always interesting in a study; but the small duel between the rooks (the highpoint 4.Rh5!!) with logical implications is of an original character. Still, the most attractive feature of this study is the play of four different batteries: three in the introduction and the final one on the last but one move.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "2nd Prize Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Michael Pasman"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "4n3/N2p2p1/8/3K4/6P1/6P1/k5P1/8 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "29"] [EventDate "2021"] 1. g5 $1 Nc7+ (1... Kb3 2. Nc8 Kc3 3. Nb6 Kd3 4. Nxd7 $18) 2. Kd6 Ne6 3. g6 $1 (3. Kxd7 Nxg5 $11) 3... Nf8 4. Nc8 $1 (4. Ke7 $2 Nxg6+ 5. Kxd7 Ne5+ $11) 4... Nxg6 5. Nb6 $1 Kb3 6. Nxd7 Kc3 7. Ke6 Nh8 $1 (7... Kd4 8. Kf7 Ne5+ 9. Nxe5 Kxe5 10. Kg6 $1 $18) 8. Ke7 Kd4 9. Kf8 Ng6+ (9... Ke4 10. Kxg7 Kf5 11. Nf6 $1 Ng6 12. g4+ Kg5 13. Ne4+ Kxg4 14. Kxg6 $18) 10. Kf7 $3 ({Try:} 10. Kxg7 $2 Ne7 $1 11. Kf6 Nd5+ 12. Kg5 Ne3 13. g4 Nxg2 $11) 10... Ne5+ 11. Nxe5 Kxe5 12. Kg6 $1 { This position is known from study of Grigoriev, 1935} (12. Kxg7 $2 Kf5 13. Kh6 Kg4 $11) 12... Ke4 13. g4 Kf4 14. g5 Kg4 15. g3 $1 $18 {Relying on N. Grigoriev's endgame study (HHdbVI#75868), the author found interesting possibilities for creating a full-scale classical-style study. A holistic scenario of play, virtuoso leaps by the knights of both sides, this time with double refusal to capture the black pawn. New and elegant.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "3rd Prize Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Jaroslav Polasek"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "1Nk2r2/K2p1N2/PP6/3r4/8/7p/8/4B3 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "29"] [EventDate "2016"] 1. Nd6+ $1 (1. b7+ $2 Kc7 2. Bg3+ d6 3. Nxd6 Rxd6 $11) 1... Rxd6 2. b7+ Kd8 ( 2... Kc7 3. Ba5+ $1 $18) 3. Nc6+ $1 (3. Bb4 $2 Ke7 $1 4. Nc6+ dxc6 5. Bxd6+ Kxd6 $11) 3... Kc7 4. Nd8 $1 (4. Ne7 $2 Rxa6+ $1 5. Kxa6 Rb8 $11) 4... Rxa6+ $1 (4... Rxd8 5. Ba5+ Kc6 6. Bxd8 h2 7. b8=Q h1=Q 8. Qb7+ $18) 5. Kxa6 Rf3 $1 ( 5... h2 6. Bg3+ $18) 6. Ne6+ $1 (6. Ba5+ $2 Kb8 7. Ne6 Ra3 8. Nc5 Rxa5+ 9. Kxa5 d6 $11) 6... dxe6 (6... Kb8 7. Bb4 $18) 7. Ba5+ Kb8 8. Bb4 Rd3 9. Bc5 Rd8 10. Ba7+ Kc7 11. Bb6+ Kd7 (11... Kc6 12. Bxd8 h2 13. b8=Q h1=Q 14. Qb7+ $18) 12. Bxd8 h2 13. b8=Q h1=Q 14. Qc7+ Ke8 15. Qe7# {The author added an interesting introduction to his earlier study (HHdbVI#4919). The solution begins with a sacrifice of a white knight, after which the play of the other leaping piece is supplemented with new subtle moves. The achievement of White's goal is complicated by both black rooks, yet this does not save Black from mate in the finale.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp. Prize e.a. Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Volodimir Samilo"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/k1p5/2P5/p3p3/8/6pK/P5P1/8 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "25"] [EventDate "2022"] 1. Kg4 $1 ({Try:} 1. Kxg3 $2 Kb6 2. Kg4 Kxc6 (2... Kc5 $2 3. Kf5 Kd4 4. Ke6 $1 e4 5. Kd7 e3 6. Kxc7 e2 7. Kd7 $1 e1=Q 8. c7 $11) 3. Kf5 Kd6 $1 (3... Kd5 $2 4. g4 e4 5. g5 e3 6. g6 e2 7. g7 e1=Q 8. g8=Q+ $11) 4. g4 c5 5. g5 c4 6. g6 Ke7 $1 $19) 1... Kb6 2. Kf5 Kxc6 3. Kxe5 Kc5 $1 ({main:} 3... Kb5 4. Kf4 $1 c5 5. Kxg3 Kc4 6. Kf2 $1 $11 ({Try:} 6. Kf3 $2 Kd3 7. g4 c4 8. g5 c3 9. g6 c2 10. g7 c1=Q 11. g8=Q Qf1+ 12. Kg3 Qg1+ $19)) 4. Kf4 Kd4 5. Kxg3 Ke3 6. Kh2 $1 {by J. Moravec, 1941} ({Try:} 6. Kh3 $2 c5 7. g4 c4 8. g5 c3 9. g6 c2 10. g7 c1=Q 11. g8=Q Qh1+ 12. Kg3 Qg1+ $19) 6... a4 $1 (6... Kf4 7. Kg1 $1 $11) 7. g4 (7. g3 $2 Kf3 $1 8. Kh3 c5 $19) 7... Kf4 8. Kh3 $3 (8. g5 $2 Kxg5 9. Kg3 Kf5 $1 10. Kf3 Ke5 11. Ke3 Kd5 $19) 8... c5 9. g5 $1 (9. Kh4 $2 c4 10. g5 c3 11. g6 c2 12. g7 c1=Q 13. g8=Q Qh1#) 9... Kxg5 10. Kg3 $1 (10. Kg2 $2 Kg4 $1 11. Kf2 Kf4 12. Ke2 Ke4 13. Kd2 Kd4 14. Kc2 Ke3 $1 15. Kc3 a3 16. Kc2 Ke2 17. Kc3 Kd1 {by R.Fine, 1941} 18. Kd3 Kc1 19. Kc3 Kb1 $1 20. Kb3 c4+ $19) 10... Kf5 11. Kf3 Ke5 12. Ke3 Kd5 13. Kd3 $11 {New colors are added to the attractive idea from a study by J. Moravec (HHdbVI#71439). Located in different parts of the board at the beginning, the two kings enter the battle from the first moves, bypassing the mined squares. The black king avoids errors in the try (2...Kc5? 3...Kd5?), while the white King's accurate moves (1.Kg4! 6.Kh2! and the highpoint 8. Kh3!!), in spite of all the dangers, take his side closer to a peaceful outcome.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "sp. Prize e.a. Sachova Skladba (v)"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "David Gurgenidze"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/1r3p2/1P1p1K1p/2p1p3/1P3p2/1kPR3Q/5p2/6q1 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "19"] [EventDate "2021"] 1. c4+ Kxc4 (1... Kxb4 2. Rb3+ Ka5 3. Rb5+ Ka6 4. Qa3#) 2. Rc3+ Kb5 $1 (2... Kxb4 3. Rb3+ Ka4 4. Ra3+ Kb5 5. Qb3+ Kc6 6. Qa4+ Kxb6 7. Rb3+ Kc7 8. Qa5+ Kb8 9. Qd8+ Ka7 10. Ra3#) 3. Qd3+ Kc6 (3... Kxb6 4. Qxd6+ Ka7 5. Ra3#) 4. b5+ Kd7 5. Qxd6+ $1 (5. Qh3+ $2 Kd8 $19) 5... Ke8 $1 (5... Kxd6 6. Rd3#) 6. Qxe5+ ({ Try:} 6. Qc6+ $2 Rd7 7. Qc8+ Rd8 8. Qc6+ Kf8 9. Qxc5+ Kg8 $19) 6... Kf8 7. Qxc5+ Kg8 8. Qf8+ $1 Kh7 $1 (8... Kxf8 9. Rc8#) 9. Qxh6+ $1 Kxh6 10. Rh3# {The author was quite successful in remodeling his earlier study (HHdbVI#48395). Forced and yet attractive play with three eye-catching sacrifices of the white queen. Paradoxically, from the initial position it is quite hard to deduce the final mate to the black king on h5... The judge found it possible to award a Special Prize to this endgame study as well.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "1 hm. Sachova Skladba "] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Siegfried Hornecker & Martin Minski"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/k7/2P1P3/3pr3/1K1R4/8/8/b3B3 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "11"] [EventDate "2021"] 1. Bf2 $1 (1. Bg3 $2 Rxe6 $11) 1... Rxe6 (1... Bxd4 $2 2. Bxd4+ $18) 2. Re4+ ( 2. Rd1+ $2 Kb8 3. Rxa1 Rxc6 $11) 2... Bd4 $1 {Umnov (1...Bxd4?), play for stalemate} 3. Bxd4+ (3. Rxd4 $2 Rxc6 4. Rc4+ Kb7 $11) (3. Rxe6 $2 Bxf2 4. c7 Kb7 5. Rc6 Kc8 $11) 3... Ka6 $1 4. c7 $1 (4. Rxe6 $2 {stalemate}) 4... Rc6 5. Re6 $1 {Umnov (3.Rxe6?/4.Rxe6?)} Rxe6 (5... Kb7 6. Rxc6 $18) 6. c8=Q# {A brief but "hot" endgame study featuring a line pieces encounter which, while not being quite profound, is nevertheless curious and smile-inviting. An interesting choice-of-move-based struggle of pieces and a vivid rendition of Umnov theme which is typically seen in the realm of problems.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "2 hm. Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Pavel Arestov & Steffen Nielsen"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "b3q3/B1R5/Q2P1b2/6p1/r7/3N4/5P1k/5K2 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "21"] [EventDate "1922.01.06"] 1. Rh7+ Rh4 2. f3 $1 (2. Rxh4+ $2 gxh4 3. f3 Qg8 $1 $11) (2. d7 $4 Bg2#) 2... Bxf3 (2... Qe6 3. Rxh4+ (3. Bg1+) 3... gxh4 4. Bg1+ (4. Nf4) 4... Kg3 5. Qxa8 $18) 3. Rxh4+ gxh4 4. Qa2+ Kg3 $1 (4... Kh3 5. d7 $1 Qxd7 6. Nf2+ Kg3 7. Bb8+ $18) 5. d7 $1 Qxd7 6. Qh2+ $1 (6. Qg8+ $2 Qg7 $11) 6... Kg4 (6... Kxh2 7. Bb8+ Qd6 (7... Kh3 8. Nf2#) 8. Bxd6+ Be5 9. Bxe5+ Kh3 10. Nf2# {Model mate.}) 7. Qh3+ $3 (7. Qf4+ $2 Kh5 8. Qxf3+ Kg6 $11) 7... Kxh3 8. Nf2+ Kg3 9. Bb8+ Qd6 10. Bxd6+ Be5 11. Bxe5# {"Model mate with blocking f3 and h4" (authors). The study climaxes in the white queen's original sacrifices (6.Qh2+!! and 7. Qh3+!!). However, the multiple vanishing of pieces in the course of the solution detracts from the overall positive impression.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "com. Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Peter Krug & Mario Garcia"] [Black ""] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "R7/4np1n/1N3pkP/5R2/6K1/8/5BN1/2q5 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "19"] [EventDate "2021"] 1. Rg8+ $1 (1. Ne3 $2 Qc6 2. Nbd5 Qxa8 3. Nxe7+ Kxh6 $11) (1. Nh4+ $2 Kxh6 2. Rh8 Kg7 3. Re8 Qd1+ $11) 1... Nxg8 (1... Kxh6 2. Rh5#) 2. Nh4+ Kxh6 3. Be3+ $1 (3. Rh5+ $2 Kg7 4. Nf5+ Kh8 $19) 3... Qxe3 4. Rh5+ Kg7 5. Nf5+ Kg6 6. Nxe3 Nh6+ (6... f5+ 7. Kh4 $1 $18) 7. Rxh6+ $1 ({Try:} 7. Kh4 $2 Ng5 $1 8. Nbd5 Nf3+ $1 ( 8... Nf5+ $2 9. Kg4 Nh6+ 10. Kg3 Kxh5 11. Nf4#) 9. Kg3 Kxh5 $11) 7... Kxh6 8. Nf5+ Kg6 9. Nd7 {zz} Ng5 10. Nf8# {The mating matrix involving such material and zugzwang is not new. For example A. Gurvich (HHdbVI#78168) with just one sacrifice, which is, however, more impressive.} 1-0
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "com. Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Michal Hlinka & Lubos Kekely"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "k7/8/4p3/1K3b2/5P2/5P2/7P/8 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "39"] [EventDate "2021"] 1. Kc6 Kb8 2. Kd7 $1 (2. h4 $2 Kc8 3. Kd6 Kd8 $19) 2... Bh3 3. f5 $1 exf5 (3... Bxf5 4. h4 $11) 4. Kc6 Ka7 {main A} (4... Kc8 {main B} 5. f4 $1 {zz} Kb8 (5... Bg2+ 6. Kd6 $11) 6. Kd6 $1 {zz} Kc8 (6... Kb7 7. Kd7 {as main A}) 7. Kc6 {zz} Kd8 8. Kd6 {zz} Ke8 9. Ke6 {zz} Kf8 10. Kf6 {zz} Kg8 11. Kg6 {zz} Kh8 12. Kh6 { zz} Kg8 13. Kg6 {zz} Bg4 14. h4 Bh3 15. h5 Bg4 16. h6 Bh3 17. h7+ Kh8 18. Kh6 Bg4 19. Kg6 {positional draw}) 5. Kc7 Ka6 6. Kc6 Ka5 7. Kc5 Ka4 8. Kc4 Ka3 9. Kc3 Ka2 10. Kc2 Ka1 (10... Bg2 11. Kd3 Bxf3 12. Ke3 Bg4 13. h4 Kb3 14. Kf4 Kc4 15. h5 $11) 11. Kc3 $1 {zz} (11. Kd3 $2 Kb2 12. Kd2 Kb1 $1 {zz} 13. Kd1 f4 14. Kd2 Bf5 15. h4 Bg6 $19) 11... Kb1 12. Kd2 Kb2 13. f4 $1 {zz} Kb1 14. Kd1 $1 {zz } Kb2 15. Kd2 {zz} Kb3 16. Kd3 {zz} Kb4 17. Kd4 {zz} Kb5 18. Kd5 {zz} Kb6 19. Kd6 {zz} Kb7 20. Kd7 {zz, positional draw. "A synthesis of positional draws with vertical and horizontal opposition and multiple zugzwangs" (authors). The judge, however, was not much impressed by the study.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard
[Event "com. Sachova Skladba"] [Site ""] [Date "2021"] [Round ""] [White "Jan Rusinek"] [Black ""] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3q4/8/5rnn/4P1P1/8/Q6K/7p/3N3k w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "22"] [EventDate "1922.01.06"] 1. Nf2+ (1. exf6 $2 Qd7+ 2. Kg3 Nf5+ {with mate}) 1... Kg1 (1... Rxf2 $4 2. Qc1+) 2. Qg3+ Kf1 3. gxf6 $1 (3. exf6 $2 h1=Q+ 4. Nxh1 Qd7+ 5. Kh2 Ng4+ 6. Kh3 Nf2+ 7. Kh2 Qh7+) (3. Qg2+ $2 Ke1 4. Qe4+ Kxf2) 3... h1=Q+ $1 4. Nxh1 Qd7+ 5. e6 $1 {Now we see the differece between 3. ef6 and gf6: from e6 bQ cannot check on h-line!} Qxe6+ 6. Kh2 Ng4+ 7. Kh3 Nxf6+ (7... Qe4 8. f7) 8. Kh2 Ng4+ 9. Kh3 Qe4 {It seems that white is in zugzwang, but} 10. Qf3+ $3 (10. Qxg4 $2 Qxh1+ 11. Kg3 Qg2#) 10... Qxf3+ 11. Ng3+ Ke1 {stalemate. Play ending with a N vs. Q, N, N stalemate position in which the knight is pinned is not new. For example cf. N. Kralin (HHdbVI#16117) in which there is no brutal capture of the rook.} 1/2-1/2
your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard